|Sunday, Feb. 3|
|New England||3:30 PT4:30 MT5:30 CT6:30 ET23:30 GMT7:30 4:30 MST5:30 CST6:30 EST5:30 CT3:30 UAE (+1)18:30 ETNaN:�|
|Review Comment: |
This manuscript was submitted as 'Tools and Systems Report' and should be reviewed along the following dimensions: (1) Quality, importance, and impact of the described tool or system (convincing evidence must be provided). (2) Clarity, illustration, and readability of the describing paper, which shall convey to the reader both the capabilities and the limitations of the tool.
This paper presents the OWL explanation workbench, an API, reference implementation and ProtГ©gГ© Plugin distributed together with ProtГ©gГ© 5.
The paper is well written, with a good backround introcution and a detailed, illustrated presentation of the tool and user interface.
The tool is however presented as a finished product. It would be helpful to give limitations, and to give plans for future releases or improvements.
The historical presentation of research on justifications is subjectively presenting two pieces of work. The amount of attention given to other (cited) works seems unbalanced. In particular, it would be good to compare to other tools for justification/debugging.
xvideo xx 105f
xvideo xx 107f
xvideo xx 665
bokep video xx 361f
xvideo xx 661f
xvideo xx 661 b
xvideo xx 661t
xvideo xx 102f
bokep indo twitter